Germany troop cuts send wrong signal to Russia, say two top US Republicans

"Prematurely reducing America's forward presence in Europe before those capabilities are fully realised risks undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin," the statement said. "Rather than withdrawing forces from the continent altogether, it is in America's interest to maintain a strong deterrent in Europe 5,000 U.S. forces to the east." The senior Democrat on the House armed services committee, Adam Smith, said the decision was "not grounded in any coherent US national security policy, strategy, or even analysis" but based on "the hurt feelings of a president who is seeking political vengeance". However, Clay Higgins, a Republican on the same committee, appeared to support the administration's move while taking a dig at perceived time-wasting chamber of Congress. "Pulling 5K American troops from the arrogant Germans. Maybe we should send them the Senate," he said on X. "Better match, and western Europe would be so well protected of the Royal Filibuster." Washington's move comes after Trump criticised German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for saying the US had been "humiliated" in the ongoing war. The US military deployment in Germany is biggest in Europe, compared with about 12,000 in Italy and 10,000 in the UK. When asked on Saturday about the withdrawal of troops, Trump said: "We're going to cut way down, and we're cutting a lot further than 5,000." Trump has also suggested pulling US troops from Italy and Spain. Last year, Washington decided to reduce its troop presence in Romania, as part of Trump's plan to shift the focus of US military commitment from Europe to the Indo-Pacific region.

There are now growing concerns within the 32-member Nato alliance that the latest US decision could weaken the organisation. "The greatest threat to the transatlantic community is not its external enemies, but the ongoing disintegration of our alliance," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned on Saturday. "We must all do what it takes to reverse this disastrous trend," he added. Trump has previously accused Germany of being "delinquent" because its military spending was well below Nato's target of 2% of its GDP. That has changed under the governments of former Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Merz, with Germany now projected to spend €105.8bn (£91bn) on defence in 2027. Overall, Germany's defence expenditure is set to reach 3.1% of GDP, taking into account other defence funds including Berlin's aid to Ukraine as it continues to fight against invading Russian troops. In a post on X on Saturday, Nato spokesperson Allison Hart said the alliance was working with the US to understand the details of the troop withdrawal decision, which "underscores the need for Europe to continue to invest more in defence and take on a greater of the responsibility for our shared security". "We're already seeing progress since allies agreed to invest 5% of GDP at the Nato summit in The Hague last year." The latest spat between Trump and Merz was triggered the German chancellor on Monday to students that "the Americans clearly have no strategy". He added that the "entire nation" was being "humiliated" by Iran. In response, Trump took to his platform Truth Social, saying Merz thought it was "OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about".

This was soon followed troop withdrawal announcement, which the Pentagon said had come from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. "We expect the withdrawal to be completed over the next six to twelve months," spokesman Sean Parnell added. Germany United States